Fabbr wrote:Adriyanos wrote:I think Pessoa needed Vetkova to stay...
It's funny to see people using this kind of comment here, like implying things when it comes about relationships between female players. I think it would be less ridiculous to talk about it openly, if one decides it is important enough to bring it to the table. And in this case I think it is, it would explain a lot of Pessoa's behavior, whenever it is really true.
It's just silly, if not judgemental, in my opinion.
No, I don't judge s**t. It's not an implication and the truth is out there, Pessoa stated it on the record. But for k**f's sake, don't defend the players when they are trying to impair their own team's season. It is clear as day that Pessoa's problem, who was Vetkova's teammate in Russia also, is not with the money, but with the team's decision.
When CSM's manager wrote that Klit and Vetkova were let go on his personal FB profile, Pessoa replied with only two words: "Big mistake". If not unprofessional, that is uncalled for, because you don't resolve these issues on Facebook. Then again, this happened merely hours before Pessoa decided she will not play.
Of course, the management should have never let the players go unpaid for such a period of time. The contract is signed by two parts and each of them should behave profesionally. But I can't see how CSM could perform this season. It's not a riot yet, but this thing happened at Oltchim and a loss with FTC in the start of the Main Round was the first domino to fall that led to the team's disbandment.
PS: I can't wait to see who will pay Pessoa, Rodrigues, Da Silva or Fachinello this kind of money. In October.