Doru Delavale wrote: Wbk wrote: Doru Delavale wrote:
....a " perfect " <<decision>> based on idiotic rule...
Based on your posts here, I can really see you not getting the point of the last 30 seconds rule
. So please take some effort to learn it before standardly blahblahing who all are the idiots
around you (the ideal person)
I think you're gone too far...why do you force me to adopt your point of view ?
Austrian Emperor Joseph II was full of good intentions but this didn't save his policy of many,many errors...to be gentle in expression...and Gorbaciov ,the same....I understood what was preliminary the task of these last 30 sec rule...but...practice is a little bit different from theory.
: I can asure you I'm not imagining myself like an ideal person,I'm too humouros for that kind of selfperception.
Stop your figurative outgos, please. It's not about your or my or anyone's point of view. It's about the truth, which is the only, elementary and objective. In this case, supported by the existing rules of the game. If you can't live with that and you can't accept what's given, it is you who have a problem. Realising what stands in the rules, even the Spanish team alone accepted the decision by not filling a post-match appeal or so. Moreover, they knew it (that they failed) already on the field.
You should know the primary point is to decide handball matches in a natural way, i.e. with true handball actions (attacks) until the very end, even during the very last, dying seconds of the match. And not with some "artificial", seemingly and actually speculative actions which prevent opponent to score a natural goal.